Showing posts with label communication. Show all posts
Showing posts with label communication. Show all posts

10 Nov 2013

Presentation skills -and how to improve


Last week I did a talk at Smidig2013, and I did my best to use the presentation skills I learned earlier this year in a practical training class. You can find the talk here (in Norwegian). In this post I will summarize my notes from the presentation skills class:

1) Body language:

a) Standing still:
Stay still and firm when you talk. Be grounded on the floor.

I had a tendency to sway, both in hips and in knees. In the presentation I held last week, you see that I do this a little bit in the beginning, then remembering to stand still.


b) Moving around:
It is great to use the whole floor, do this: talk, move, talk. This means do not talk when you move, and it is ok to move and turn your back to the audience, but do pause the talking when you do this.

I have a tendency to much more swaying when I move, so for me, it is more important to focus on a then on this.

c) Arms
  • do not touch yourself (not in the face or anywhere else.)
  • you may have your arm(s) straight down beside you
  • or you may use your hands to gesticulate –not in front of you, the best is using large movements out to the side (feels wired, but looks great, use video and record yourself and you will be convinced)

For me, I have focused on the first one of this, I am aware of the last one, but think this is hard. Most of my gesticulation is in front of me.


d) Words
Skip all words that do not have a meaning. Words like “ehm”, “sure”, “right”, “like” and so on. It is much better to pause and to have just silence. It feels strange, but sounds great!

After practising this and recording myself, I have been aware that silence is definitely my friend. When I need to think, it feels like minutes, but in reality, it only takes seconds. A pause only makes the content standing out.


2) Content
When all the rest is in place, off course content is the most important part of the presentation.

a) Introduction part one
(10-30 seconds) Get on the same page with the audience, let the audience know that you know the context and domain, and get each and one of them to buy in to the idea of you being able to contribute in the area of topic.

For me this was an eye-opener. Before I attended this class, I had the impression that it was smart to present any controversial ideas or summarise the whole point of the presentation in the introduction. Big mistake!
b) Introduction part two
(10-30 seconds) Let the audience know what they can expect during the presentation, i.e.: “in this presentation I will start by examining the three different options, and summarize pros and cons. I will also present the recommended solution and how to bring this forward”

I did not know how important it is to let the audience get a sense of what to expect, and this being key to engage the audience during the presentation, making them curios.
c) The PowerPoint
Who are the slides for? –It is not supposed to be for the presenter J The audience are only capable of either reading or listening –not both at the same time.

If it is important that the slides capture content for people not present (it is going to be sent out) consider making two separate slide decks or provide the extra content in the “notes” section.

I have fallen in love with pictures on my slides only. This is also what I used in my presentation at Smidig 2013. These are three slides from that slide deck:





 
 

d) The end
Summarize your point and present next steps or actions that the audence should take.

 



11 Oct 2013

How to control everything in your project!

Guess what!? I have discovered a process that let you control not only timescale, budget and quality but also scope, risk and produced benefits!

During the initial project stage, the business side will know all these aspects and make the well-informed decision to start the project or not.


And this process is called Prince2


By now, I guess that you have realized that I am not serious.

I find it a bit strange that people buy into this illusion, that it is possible to know all these aspects up front.


On the other hand, I find too many agile practitioners being too fundamentalists in their approach to agile. We have to take into consideration that organisations do have some boundaries that they need to adhere to. Not everyone can or will go all in from day one.


I think one solution is for the Prince2 fanatics to emphasize the “management by stages” which equals “embrace uncertainty”.


I also think Agile fanatics should be less fanatic in their communication, because what is the result of fanatic communication? People that already think the same way as you; they will nod, whereas the rest will dismiss all you say.


Prince2 provides a common vocabulary that is great when communicating, and the agile community provides the values and methodology that we need to deliver (the right) software.


I think we can use both to get where we want. We just need to
  • be practical about implementing Prince2
  • not getting bureaucratic
  • emphasize the flexibility that is built in
  •  implement agile and lean into this super-thin framework   
    

After all: this is what we want:

“Speed, Quality & Low Cost are Fully Compatible
Companies that compete on the basis of speed have a big cost advantage, deliver superior quality, and are more attuned to their customers' needs.”

-Poppendieck



Have a nice weekend!
Cheers,
Eira
-Prince2 certified, agile at heart